How States Can Move From Fragmented Programs to Shared, Scalable Infrastructure Using FAST
The CMS Aligned Networks Pledge marks a clear inflection point in federal health IT policy. For the first time, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is not simply setting compliance requirements for individual programs—it is asking the healthcare ecosystem to operate as connected networks, capable of secure, real-time, standards-based data exchange across payers, providers, public health and patients.
For states, this shift is significant.
States are no longer just one participant among many. They are increasingly the anchor for trust, identity, consent and directory infrastructure that enable CMS-aligned networks to function at scale. Medicaid programs, state CIO offices and HIEs sit at the intersection of policy, operations and technology. The CMS Aligned Networks Pledge makes that role explicit.
This blog explains:
- What the CMS Aligned Networks Pledge really changes for states
- Why traditional, program-by-program approaches will not scale
- How the HL7® FHIR® at Scale Taskforce (FAST) provides the infrastructure states can reuse across initiatives
- How states can leverage existing systems and vendors without starting over
The CMS Aligned Networks Pledge: A Shift from Programs to Infrastructure
Historically, CMS initiatives have been implemented as discrete programs:
- A new reporting requirement
- A new API mandate
- A new exchange use case
- Trusted digital identity and patient matching
- Scalable security and partner onboarding
- Computable, portable consent
- Authoritative directories for endpoint discovery
The CMS Aligned Networks Pledge represents a different expectation.
CMS is signaling that future interoperability depends on shared infrastructure capabilities, including:
- Trusted digital identity and patient matching
- Scalable security and partner onboarding
- Computable, portable consent
- Authoritative directories for endpoint discovery
These are not features of a single application. They are ecosystem functions.
For states, this means success is no longer measured by whether a single system goes live, but by whether multiple programs can reuse the same trust and exchange foundations.

